ANALYSIS | Was Plug Power's stock plunge one company's bad luck, or a warning sign for the wider hydrogen industry?
Other electrolyser manufacturers have raced to distance themselves from Plug’s problems
US green hydrogen technology firm Plug Power shocked the market last week when it admitted in its Q3 earnings report that its negative margins had grown wider and that it could run out of money within 12 months.
Stay ahead on hydrogen with our free newsletter
Its share price fell by 40% in the wake of the report — and the shock seemed so great that stocks in other hydrogen-focused companies, such as Ballard Power and FuelCell Energy, also fell significantly at the same time, before later recovering.
“We don’t think that risk is real, but just saying it out loud spooks investors,” he explained, adding that the company is on course to receive a US Department of Energy loan to bolster its capital.
“ITM Power won’t face these issues anymore — simply because we’ve worked hard to identify and fix them,” he wrote.
Plug has blamed much of its latest loss on supply disruptions in its fuel business.
However, this project has now been delayed to the end of the year. “Unfortunately, permits don’t always move as quickly as you thought they would,” West noted.
So are Plug’s fortunes really just the bad luck of a single company?
But they added that the “performance of various clean energy related themes has been challenging this year”, while “on a longer scale, the index level has been relatively rangebound [ie, fluctuating between periods of growth and decline] since January 2022”.
West explained: “The outlook is still very positive but it’s taking a little longer for the market to develop.”
While 2022 saw strong political promises to drive the uptake of clean hydrogen through support schemes, many of these subsidies are yet to come into effect, leading developers to hold off taking final investment decisions (FIDs).
For example, the Regional Hydrogen Hubs programme in the US — approved in the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Act — is unlikely to deliver grants to its seven chosen applicants until next year.
And while lucrative production tax credits of up to $3/kg are offered as part of the US Inflation Reduction Act, companies cannot claim them until the Treasury Department has clarified the rules for qualification.
“It should come out soon. But it was coming out soon three months ago,” West said, adding that “there’s a big part of the industry that’s continuing forward but not willing to take the final [investment] decision” until it is clear whether their project will be eligible for the top rate of the tax credit.
“You may be in a situation where your project economics can really change with the interpretation, so you’re really in a holding pattern,” he explained.
For Plug, this means that in addition to its fuel supply woes, many of the electrolysers in the company’s order backlog are yet to be delivered — and therefore relatively little cash has been changing hands.
The green hydrogen technology firm only registered $26m in revenue from its electrolyser business in Q3.
The lack of guidance in the US is likely to have particularly weighted the S&P Kensho index, since 15 of its 17 companies are based in that country.
So while major subsidies have not flowed as quickly as expected, the first tranches in Europe and the US will almost certainly be awarded in the first half of 2024 — which will quickly lead to final investment decisions and a sharp upturn in the largely stalled clean hydrogen sector.
(Copyright)Additionality, time-matching and geographic correlation
“Additionality” means that the green hydrogen would have to produced from new renewables projects, so that they do not utilise existing clean electricity facilities that would otherwise help decarbonise the power grid.
“Time-matching", or "temporal correlation”, relates to how frequently producers would have to prove that their electrolysers have been powered by 100% renewable energy — usually hourly, weekly, monthly or annually — and therefore to what extent they can use grid electricity at times when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining, and then send the same anount of renewable energy back to the grid at a later date.
"Geographic correlation" refers to how close the hydrogen-producing electrolyser is to the source of renewable energy it uses. Distances can be set to ensure that an electrolyser in, say, Texas, is not powered by solar panels in California through renewable energy credits, which in practice could mean that green power is sent to a grid that doesn't need it, with the electricity actually used by the electrolyser coming from fossil-fuel power plants.
All three rules would prevent fossil-powered grid electricity being used directly or indirectly to produce "green hydrogen".