Controversial hydrogen heating trial poised for green light — but local authority demands last-minute debate
Decision on Redcar pilot due amid mixed messages from London, as campaigners make last-ditch attempt to secure independent advice
A controversial hydrogen heating trial in northeast England looks positioned to move ahead in the coming weeks following a deal to reduce the size of the project, as well as what local campaigners have described as “apathy” towards the programme among the area’s impoverished residents.
Stay ahead on hydrogen with our free newsletter
NGN has agreed to host the debate in early December, according to Redcar and Cleveland Council leader Alec Brown, adding that “independent qualified experts” will be invited.
NGN confirmed that it is in talks with the local authority to facilitate a public meeting for impacted residents and landlords.
Shrinking project
However, a decision on the project is due in December, leaving residents very little time to secure an independent debate.
The deal suggests that the UK government may be prepared to back a reduced version of the project, but mixed messages have been emanating out of London for some time.
But speaking at last Thursday’s public meeting, Liebreich said that ministers may be hoping to push through a positive decision on the hydrogen heating ahead of next year’s UK general election — which is widely expected to result in the ruling Conservative party losing power.
“The government might want to bounce something through because there is this feeling… [that] it sounds fabulous and it sounds progressive and it sounds like it squares the circle between net zero [and the associated cost and disruption],” he said.
“It seduces particularly politicians who don’t have a STEM [science, technology, engineering and mathematics] background, who don’t have physics, who don’t have science.”
‘Poorer areas’
NGN must now show evidence of “strong public support” for the proposal. But the public response in Redcar has been significantly more muted than in Whitby.
At Thursday's public meeting, attended by more than 100 residents, one local councillor warned the community that it was being targeted precisely because its high rate of poverty means that residents are ill-equipped to oppose a project such as this.
“What I’ve noticed is that corporates like to pick on poorer areas of the country; they have less resistance,” said Tristain Learoyd, who sits as a councillor on the local authority of Redcar and Cleveland for the centre-left Liberal Democrat party.
To illustrate, Learoyd compared the response to the areas of Coatham and Kirkleatham, where the hydrogen heating trial is due to take place, with the response to a potential housing estate in his more affluent ward of St Germain.
“I get emails every single day about [the housing development],” he said. “And another objection goes in or another complaint goes in because you’ve got a middle-class community with a little bit more time on their hands who aren’t in a desperate spiral to simply survive.”
Warning of “apathy”, other residents at the public meeting reported that many of their neighbours had been swayed by the promise of brand new appliances.
“As several experts and local councillors pointed out [at the meeting], Coatham hasn’t been chosen by accident,” one resident said after the event on a private Facebook group. “It’s been chosen because it’s one of the most impoverished areas in the country, with a highly transient population, little community cohesion and where people are easily bought or persuaded with a little bit of money.”
According to England’s public health agency, the Redcar and Cleveland area is one of the 20% most deprived areas in the country, while according to the local authority, Coatham is in the bottom 10%.
The charge of apathy tracks with NGN’s own findings. In a residents’ survey carried out last year, the gas company found that 76% were in favour of the trial going ahead, while 19% were indifferent and 5% against — however, only a maximum of 35% of affected residents responded to the survey at all.
NGN had declined to attend Thurday’s public meeting, citing an issue with “misinformation” around safety and the scope of the offer.
However, NGN is reportedly planning to install hydrogen sensors in place of ventilation holes.
This prompted significant debate on Thursday, with one audience member, claiming to be a hydrogen engineer, warning that sensors are unreliable, hard to come by and difficult to maintain.
“The Health & Safety Executive [UK safety regulator] recognises that it is very difficult to prevent hydrogen leaks,” Cebon added. “And they also say that even small sparks caused by certain types of clothing could cause a hydrogen explosion.”
Liebreich also pointed out that each householder will need to develop a mitigation plan for when the sensor goes off, as hydrogen is an unfamiliar substance.
“If the sensor goes off, you haven’t got ventilation, you’ve got to do something,” he said on Thursday. “Leave the property, warn your neighbours, open windows? Don’t know.”
“We have had problems with misinformation being circulated in the community, which originates from people who claim to be independent experts,” the NGN spokesperson said. “This misinformation can cause alarm and undue worry to residents and to attend would give the impression the meeting is officially connected to the project.”
Redcar’s local Member of Parliament Jacob Young, a Conservative who is an active proponent of hydrogen heating, also declined an invite, while representatives from DESNZ were also invited.
(Copyright)