Germany set to overbuild its hydrogen pipeline network: analyst

The government’s planned 9,700km network will be drastically oversized in the short term, with its import capacity underutilised in 2050, according to Aurora Energy Research

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (right) in the Bundestag with the leaders of his coalition partners, the Green’s Robert Habeck (centre) and FDP head Christian Lindner
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (right) in the Bundestag with the leaders of his coalition partners, the Green’s Robert Habeck (centre) and FDP head Christian LindnerPhoto: Juergen Nowak/Shutterstock
The German government is on track to build more hydrogen pipelines than needed to meet H2 demand by 2030, while also setting itself up for unused capacity at border crossing points, warns UK-headquartered Aurora Energy Research.

Stay ahead on hydrogen with our free newsletter

Keep up with the latest developments in the international hydrogen industry with the free Accelerate Hydrogen newsletter. Sign up now for an unbiased, clear-sighted view of the fast-growing hydrogen sector.
Sign up now

The research firm’s analysis, commissioned by German gas storage operator coalition INES, notes that proposed 9,700km core network — unveiled by the government in November and currently undergoing consultation until next week — assumes hydrogen demand will grow from 56TWh today to 279TWh by 2032.

However, the government’s own strategy foresees 95-130TWh of demand by 2030, while Aurora predicts that based on current market development, the country will only need 73TWh of H2 by that year — meaning the pipeline network may only carry a quarter of its capacity at first.

Even in the research firm’s more optimistic net-zero scenario, hydrogen demand only reaches 122.6TWh, still leaving Germany’s pipelines underutilised at the start of next decade.

Aurora acknowledges that in the long term, it forecasts 303.2TWh of demand by 2050 based on current market development — matching up more closely with the pipeline network’s capacity — and 562TWh in its net zero scenario.

However, of this 303.2TWh, the research firm also predicts that 148TWh could be shipped into Germany, with 29TWh specifically brought in as derivatives such as ammonia and methanol, while only 73TWh will be imported via pipeline.

Frederik Beelitz, who leads Aurora Energy Research’s work on hydrogen in Berlin, tells Hydrogen Insight that while “for short distances and high volumes, compressed hydrogen pipelines make most sense”, shipping in H2 as a liquid or through carriers is more attractive over longer distances.

This is compounded by the growing number of export-oriented hydrogen projects overseas, which are predicted to produce extremely cheap H2, and a predicted fall in the cost of shipping in the long term.

Aurora argues that the pipeline network would need less than 10GWh/h of import capacity at border crossing points with Denmark, Norway, France and Italy to cover Germany’s hydrogen demand by 2032, while only 28GWh/h of import capacity would be needed by 2050.

However, the proposed network includes, 13 cross-border import routes with a combined capacity of 59GWh/h, which the research firm warns could end up underused in the long term.

Aurora adds that even in its net zero scenario, “the required border crossing capacities are, according to a rough estimate, only 52GWh/h in 2050”.

As such, it cautions that based on the risk of oversizing and creation of unused capacities in the long term, the current plan for the hydrogen pipeline network “does not provide a robust path”.

Aurora also calls in its report for further planning around domestic storage capacities for the network, as “storage makes it possible to reduce the otherwise required capacities of import routes”.

“In view of the enormous quantities of hydrogen consumed, the hydrogen core network appears to be more of a hydrogen target network, and the truth is that we cannot yet see exactly what the target is,” said Sebastian Heinermann, managing director of INES, in a comment on the findings.

He added: “The Aurora short analysis shows us how great the uncertainties in network planning currently still are and how great the risk is that overcapacities will now be developed that may never be utilized. We therefore recommend identifying those parts of the hydrogen network for which there is relevance across several scenarios. For these parts of the network, dimensioning for longer-term requirements seems sensible.”

Updated to include clarification from Aurora Energy Research on their projected share of shipping versus pipeline imports.
(Copyright)
Published 5 January 2024, 14:24Updated 9 January 2024, 15:16