How easy will it be for green hydrogen projects in developing nations to export to Europe? Part 1: Getting financed
High cost of financing and potential pitfalls in byzantine EU regulations could make it difficult for projects with otherwise cheap renewable H2 to get off the ground
Green hydrogen has often been touted as having the potential to change the fortunes of developing countries with a combination of high wind and solar resources and vast swathes of greenfield land.
Stay ahead on hydrogen with our free newsletter
But the first hurdle for export-focused projects to clear is to actually secure financing and begin construction, which may be easier said than done.
First, the cost of capital is just much higher in developing economies than in Europe.
“When it comes to the financing package, the levelised cost of hydrogen is so sensitive to the cost of financing,” said Marco Raffinetti, CEO of Hyphen Hydrogen Energy (which is developing a $10bn project in Namibia), at last week’s Investing in Green Hydrogen conference in London.
While he anticipates that “the cheapest projects with any resource will always get developed first”, he added that whether facilities end up concentrated in specific countries or diversified between different high-potential countries will “come down to the financiers and the offtakers”.
This means that development bank finance — generally backed by governments in order to provide preferential interest rates — will be key for many projects in developing economies to secure capital without massively increasing the price of their volumes of hydrogen.
The EU’s Delegated Acts’ rules around additionality — ie, the principle that green hydrogen is produced by new renewables projects — do allow for state aid to fund renewable energy assets built alongside an electrolyser, or with a direct connection.
However, the acts prohibit electrolysers from drawing on renewables projects previously built with state aid “in the form of operating aid or investment aid”, even if they otherwise meet the Delegated Acts' criteria of coming on line within three years of the electrolysers (albeit with some loopholes for repowering or subsidies that are paid back).
It is very unlikely this will impact projects that already plan to build vast swathes of wind and solar to power their electrolysers — particularly in countries that already lack sufficient grid infrastructure, let alone existing renewables.